<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Celebrating Mixed Messages.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.themudflats.net/2009/05/05/celebrating-mixed-messages/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.themudflats.net/2009/05/05/celebrating-mixed-messages/</link>
	<description>Tiptoeing Through the Muck of Alaskan Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:11:08 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: GailyDecoratedPicinicBasketcase</title>
		<link>http://www.themudflats.net/2009/05/05/celebrating-mixed-messages/#comment-52870</link>
		<dc:creator>GailyDecoratedPicinicBasketcase</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 14:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themudflats.net/?p=3474#comment-52870</guid>
		<description>Think yer onto something, ez.pz.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Think yer onto something, ez.pz.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sauerkraut</title>
		<link>http://www.themudflats.net/2009/05/05/celebrating-mixed-messages/#comment-52868</link>
		<dc:creator>sauerkraut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 14:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themudflats.net/?p=3474#comment-52868</guid>
		<description>porn to politics.  not a new concept. they&#039;ve done it in Italy for a few decades.

Louisiana apparently is doing it, too, so why not soft stuff like Candies Foundation?

http://run4chocolate.wordpress.com/2009/05/07/adult-star-stormy-daniels-to-take-on-adult-customer-david-vitter/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>porn to politics.  not a new concept. they&#8217;ve done it in Italy for a few decades.</p>
<p>Louisiana apparently is doing it, too, so why not soft stuff like Candies Foundation?</p>
<p><a href="http://run4chocolate.wordpress.com/2009/05/07/adult-star-stormy-daniels-to-take-on-adult-customer-david-vitter/">http://run4chocolate.wordpress.com/2009/05/07/adult-star-stormy-daniels-to-take-on-adult-customer-david-vitter/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trisha</title>
		<link>http://www.themudflats.net/2009/05/05/celebrating-mixed-messages/#comment-52866</link>
		<dc:creator>trisha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 14:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themudflats.net/?p=3474#comment-52866</guid>
		<description>Some have said that this ad is for Candie&#039;s perfume and NOT the foundation. 

Well, here is the link to the Candie&#039;s foundation for abstinence.  
http://www.candiesfoundation.org/tshirts.html

Their slogan:
I AM SEXY ENOUGH TO KEEP YOU WAITING (worn on a tight tank-T by young girl).         WTF!!!!!        Are they kidding?

What kind of message is that for teenager girls?   How about teaching them that they are more than sex objects or that there is more than being sexy.   Would the religious right have their teenage daughters wearing this t-shirt? What&#039;s the message---that teens should be sexy, but just be a tease? 

 Why isn&#039;t Bristol wearing the t-shirt that has the slogan for the campaign she is promoting?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some have said that this ad is for Candie&#8217;s perfume and NOT the foundation. </p>
<p>Well, here is the link to the Candie&#8217;s foundation for abstinence.<br />
<a href="http://www.candiesfoundation.org/tshirts.html">http://www.candiesfoundation.org/tshirts.html</a></p>
<p>Their slogan:<br />
I AM SEXY ENOUGH TO KEEP YOU WAITING (worn on a tight tank-T by young girl).         WTF!!!!!        Are they kidding?</p>
<p>What kind of message is that for teenager girls?   How about teaching them that they are more than sex objects or that there is more than being sexy.   Would the religious right have their teenage daughters wearing this t-shirt? What&#8217;s the message&#8212;that teens should be sexy, but just be a tease? </p>
<p> Why isn&#8217;t Bristol wearing the t-shirt that has the slogan for the campaign she is promoting?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trisha</title>
		<link>http://www.themudflats.net/2009/05/05/celebrating-mixed-messages/#comment-52864</link>
		<dc:creator>trisha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 14:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themudflats.net/?p=3474#comment-52864</guid>
		<description>Palin&#039;s &quot;family values&quot;..... Has Sarah ever seen these ads from Candie&#039;s?  Was she even aware that they are known for sexually charged ads that are targeted to teens?  Does she know that is why they created this foundation---because they were getting flack about their ads marketing to teens?  

Does Palin&#039;s religious right base know that this is the kind of Company that Bristol is representing?   

What is she thinking?   Then again, we know she doesn&#039;t think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Palin&#8217;s &#8220;family values&#8221;&#8230;.. Has Sarah ever seen these ads from Candie&#8217;s?  Was she even aware that they are known for sexually charged ads that are targeted to teens?  Does she know that is why they created this foundation&#8212;because they were getting flack about their ads marketing to teens?  </p>
<p>Does Palin&#8217;s religious right base know that this is the kind of Company that Bristol is representing?   </p>
<p>What is she thinking?   Then again, we know she doesn&#8217;t think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Priceless</title>
		<link>http://www.themudflats.net/2009/05/05/celebrating-mixed-messages/#comment-52714</link>
		<dc:creator>Priceless</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 02:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themudflats.net/?p=3474#comment-52714</guid>
		<description>What really torches me is that as a card carrying member of the GOP, I can&#039;t get better quality reps?  Pluezzes.  Bristol is NOT  role model for my teen daughters.  Palin&#039;s family is NOT LIKE mine.  Palin had an affair.  McCain had an affair.  Craig gets caught playing footisie ball in the mens room.  WHY CAN&#039;T WE WALK THE WALK WE TALK?  Is that asking too much?  If you preach morality, live it.  Don&#039;t expect others to not be watching you pretty darn closely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What really torches me is that as a card carrying member of the GOP, I can&#8217;t get better quality reps?  Pluezzes.  Bristol is NOT  role model for my teen daughters.  Palin&#8217;s family is NOT LIKE mine.  Palin had an affair.  McCain had an affair.  Craig gets caught playing footisie ball in the mens room.  WHY CAN&#8217;T WE WALK THE WALK WE TALK?  Is that asking too much?  If you preach morality, live it.  Don&#8217;t expect others to not be watching you pretty darn closely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leenie17</title>
		<link>http://www.themudflats.net/2009/05/05/celebrating-mixed-messages/#comment-52674</link>
		<dc:creator>leenie17</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 00:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themudflats.net/?p=3474#comment-52674</guid>
		<description>I am amazed that the Palin family believes that anyone will take Bristol&#039;s effort to promote abstinence seriously, particularly after her own comments during the GVS interview (youtube is forever, Sarah!).  While admirable on the surface (and I DO want to give Bristol the benefit of the doubt but it&#039;s really, really hard when anyone named Palin is involved!), the connection with Candies with their semi-pornographic ads is quite a stunning contradiction.  

More importantly, since Bristol apparently didn&#039;t learn any lessons from her own mother&#039;s experience (the  *wedding---&gt;Track&#039;s arrival*  timeline, anyone???), why should teenagers who don&#039;t even know the family be swayed by Bristol&#039;s story?  Since abstinence has seemingly failed TWO generations of the Palins, perhaps they should consider more &#039;realistic&#039; options.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am amazed that the Palin family believes that anyone will take Bristol&#8217;s effort to promote abstinence seriously, particularly after her own comments during the GVS interview (youtube is forever, Sarah!).  While admirable on the surface (and I DO want to give Bristol the benefit of the doubt but it&#8217;s really, really hard when anyone named Palin is involved!), the connection with Candies with their semi-pornographic ads is quite a stunning contradiction.  </p>
<p>More importantly, since Bristol apparently didn&#8217;t learn any lessons from her own mother&#8217;s experience (the  *wedding&#8212;&gt;Track&#8217;s arrival*  timeline, anyone???), why should teenagers who don&#8217;t even know the family be swayed by Bristol&#8217;s story?  Since abstinence has seemingly failed TWO generations of the Palins, perhaps they should consider more &#8216;realistic&#8217; options.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blue moose</title>
		<link>http://www.themudflats.net/2009/05/05/celebrating-mixed-messages/#comment-52631</link>
		<dc:creator>blue moose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 22:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themudflats.net/?p=3474#comment-52631</guid>
		<description>This kids is controlled and exploited by her horrible parents and that is so SAD!  No independent thinking allowed in that free house!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This kids is controlled and exploited by her horrible parents and that is so SAD!  No independent thinking allowed in that free house!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wurzelhexli</title>
		<link>http://www.themudflats.net/2009/05/05/celebrating-mixed-messages/#comment-52507</link>
		<dc:creator>Wurzelhexli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 19:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themudflats.net/?p=3474#comment-52507</guid>
		<description>Has anyone asked themseves why Tripp was so COMPLETELY out? I mean, he did not even twitch his nose when Bristols hair was in his face! He also did not wince or stir when she shifted him... Curious, how the Palin babies always seem to be such completely solid sleepers (remember Trig on the campaign trail? He was also completely out during the tumultuous rallies and the convention...)
Thoughts of &#039;drugging&#039; come to my mind... Maybe something that Child Protective Services should look into!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone asked themseves why Tripp was so COMPLETELY out? I mean, he did not even twitch his nose when Bristols hair was in his face! He also did not wince or stir when she shifted him&#8230; Curious, how the Palin babies always seem to be such completely solid sleepers (remember Trig on the campaign trail? He was also completely out during the tumultuous rallies and the convention&#8230;)<br />
Thoughts of &#8216;drugging&#8217; come to my mind&#8230; Maybe something that Child Protective Services should look into!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin</title>
		<link>http://www.themudflats.net/2009/05/05/celebrating-mixed-messages/#comment-52437</link>
		<dc:creator>OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 18:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themudflats.net/?p=3474#comment-52437</guid>
		<description>Candies Foundation is not an abstinence foundation, just saying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Candies Foundation is not an abstinence foundation, just saying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ez.pz.</title>
		<link>http://www.themudflats.net/2009/05/05/celebrating-mixed-messages/#comment-52413</link>
		<dc:creator>ez.pz.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 17:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themudflats.net/?p=3474#comment-52413</guid>
		<description>Watched the interview... made me wonder about how Todd got the reputation as being some sort of Machiavellian, Svengali-type of operator, constantly behind the scenes, directing and manipulating.

On the basis of that performance, he comes across as being slightly less threatening than a gaily-decorated picnic-basket.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watched the interview&#8230; made me wonder about how Todd got the reputation as being some sort of Machiavellian, Svengali-type of operator, constantly behind the scenes, directing and manipulating.</p>
<p>On the basis of that performance, he comes across as being slightly less threatening than a gaily-decorated picnic-basket.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
