<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Daily Wrap Up &#8211; Showing Some Skin.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.themudflats.net/2009/05/27/daily-wrap-up-showing-some-skin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.themudflats.net/2009/05/27/daily-wrap-up-showing-some-skin/</link>
	<description>Tiptoeing Through the Muck of Alaskan Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:02:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: the problem child</title>
		<link>http://www.themudflats.net/2009/05/27/daily-wrap-up-showing-some-skin/#comment-62720</link>
		<dc:creator>the problem child</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 01:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themudflats.net/?p=4102#comment-62720</guid>
		<description>MRRROW, sandra! ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MRRROW, sandra! <img src='http://www.themudflats.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sandra in oregon</title>
		<link>http://www.themudflats.net/2009/05/27/daily-wrap-up-showing-some-skin/#comment-62698</link>
		<dc:creator>sandra in oregon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 23:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themudflats.net/?p=4102#comment-62698</guid>
		<description>Maybe she didn&#039;t try the sitting down with the skirt at home.  However, as soon as she sat in the car she would have known it was a problem.  But then she asked to be seated on the stage.  A better move would have been to do a walk on as she seemed to always do during her campaign appearances.

It does seem that she had two different outfits that day.  Maybe this was the one she was wearing for work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe she didn&#8217;t try the sitting down with the skirt at home.  However, as soon as she sat in the car she would have known it was a problem.  But then she asked to be seated on the stage.  A better move would have been to do a walk on as she seemed to always do during her campaign appearances.</p>
<p>It does seem that she had two different outfits that day.  Maybe this was the one she was wearing for work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the problem child</title>
		<link>http://www.themudflats.net/2009/05/27/daily-wrap-up-showing-some-skin/#comment-62636</link>
		<dc:creator>the problem child</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 21:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themudflats.net/?p=4102#comment-62636</guid>
		<description>From the open thread: 
-------------
Madcity Chick Says:
May 28th, 2009 at 12:39 PM

A different shirtless Levi photo w/baby is up on the CNN ticker. They’re a little late on the story, but they have a different pic than the one we’ve seen.

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/05/28/report-todd-palin
——————
But, in breaking news, they have the information that Todd is Sarah Palin’s wife!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the open thread:<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
Madcity Chick Says:<br />
May 28th, 2009 at 12:39 PM</p>
<p>A different shirtless Levi photo w/baby is up on the CNN ticker. They’re a little late on the story, but they have a different pic than the one we’ve seen.</p>
<p><a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/05/28/report-todd-palin">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/05/28/report-todd-palin</a><br />
——————<br />
But, in breaking news, they have the information that Todd is Sarah Palin’s wife!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mudpuppy Wannabe</title>
		<link>http://www.themudflats.net/2009/05/27/daily-wrap-up-showing-some-skin/#comment-62628</link>
		<dc:creator>Mudpuppy Wannabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 20:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themudflats.net/?p=4102#comment-62628</guid>
		<description>Has anybody here ever read any E.F. Benson? 

One of my fave silly British comedy of manners writers...

For those of you who have, I&#039;m becoming more and more convinced that Sarah is Lucia.

(And re: Say NO to Palin&#039;s pic link...Who sits in parking lots to sign bills????? There&#039;s something in the way she&#039;s sitting in that picture that makes me think of a little girl playing grown-up empress...Unbelievable...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anybody here ever read any E.F. Benson? </p>
<p>One of my fave silly British comedy of manners writers&#8230;</p>
<p>For those of you who have, I&#8217;m becoming more and more convinced that Sarah is Lucia.</p>
<p>(And re: Say NO to Palin&#8217;s pic link&#8230;Who sits in parking lots to sign bills????? There&#8217;s something in the way she&#8217;s sitting in that picture that makes me think of a little girl playing grown-up empress&#8230;Unbelievable&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the problem child</title>
		<link>http://www.themudflats.net/2009/05/27/daily-wrap-up-showing-some-skin/#comment-62623</link>
		<dc:creator>the problem child</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 20:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themudflats.net/?p=4102#comment-62623</guid>
		<description>Irishgirl, austintx, If I was wearing that poor girl&#039;s sports bra, I&#039;d be thinking of reducing my mass to improve my energy, also, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Irishgirl, austintx, If I was wearing that poor girl&#8217;s sports bra, I&#8217;d be thinking of reducing my mass to improve my energy, also, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the problem child</title>
		<link>http://www.themudflats.net/2009/05/27/daily-wrap-up-showing-some-skin/#comment-62620</link>
		<dc:creator>the problem child</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 20:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themudflats.net/?p=4102#comment-62620</guid>
		<description>Say NO to Palin in Politics Says:
May 28th, 2009 at 11:12 AM

It seems to me the arguement to be made is that the leaked email has already been “made public” to someone, by either a participant/recipiant of the emails or Scarah’s administration.

SO, I don’t see how they can “close” the door on these. It’s already been made public domain. A select “few” can not have “privilege”.
----------

The e-mail that was leaked/ released to the Ear was the cleavage complaint e-mail between Andree and that GINO staffer. Logically, there couldn&#039;t be any executive deliberative process privilege. It was a response to a citizen complaint. 

However, the internal e-mail discussions at the GINO&#039;s office might possibly carry that privilege, if the GINO and her staff are considering what to do about the dress code policy, whether to change it, how to go about enforcing it etc. 

So yes, a few can have privilege, and some might not, even if they were all in the same e-mail &quot;string&quot;.

Are they abusing the privilege claim to avoid embarrassment? Almost certainly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Say NO to Palin in Politics Says:<br />
May 28th, 2009 at 11:12 AM</p>
<p>It seems to me the arguement to be made is that the leaked email has already been “made public” to someone, by either a participant/recipiant of the emails or Scarah’s administration.</p>
<p>SO, I don’t see how they can “close” the door on these. It’s already been made public domain. A select “few” can not have “privilege”.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>The e-mail that was leaked/ released to the Ear was the cleavage complaint e-mail between Andree and that GINO staffer. Logically, there couldn&#8217;t be any executive deliberative process privilege. It was a response to a citizen complaint. </p>
<p>However, the internal e-mail discussions at the GINO&#8217;s office might possibly carry that privilege, if the GINO and her staff are considering what to do about the dress code policy, whether to change it, how to go about enforcing it etc. </p>
<p>So yes, a few can have privilege, and some might not, even if they were all in the same e-mail &#8220;string&#8221;.</p>
<p>Are they abusing the privilege claim to avoid embarrassment? Almost certainly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Irishgirl</title>
		<link>http://www.themudflats.net/2009/05/27/daily-wrap-up-showing-some-skin/#comment-62618</link>
		<dc:creator>Irishgirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 20:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themudflats.net/?p=4102#comment-62618</guid>
		<description>austintx,
I thought you would appreciate that pic...and I just knew it would make you think of Einstein!!! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>austintx,<br />
I thought you would appreciate that pic&#8230;and I just knew it would make you think of Einstein!!! <img src='http://www.themudflats.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: austintx</title>
		<link>http://www.themudflats.net/2009/05/27/daily-wrap-up-showing-some-skin/#comment-62615</link>
		<dc:creator>austintx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 20:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themudflats.net/?p=4102#comment-62615</guid>
		<description>IrishGirl - Seeing that first pic. made me think of this :
Mass–energy equivalence was proposed in Albert Einstein&#039;s 1905 paper, &quot;Does the inertia of a body depend upon its energy-content?&quot;, one of his Annus Mirabilis (&quot;Miraculous Year&quot;) Papers.[1] Einstein was not the first to propose a mass–energy relationship, and various similar formulas appeared before Einstein&#039;s theory with incorrect numerical coefficients and an incomplete interpretation. Einstein was the first to propose the simple formula and the first to interpret it correctly: as a general principle which follows from the relativistic symmetries of space and time.

In the formula, c2 is the conversion factor required to convert from units of mass to units of energy. The formula does not depend on a specific system of units. Using the International System of Units, joules are used to measure energy, kilograms for mass, meters per second for speed. Note that 1 joule equals 1 kg·m2/s2. In unit-specific terms, E (in joules) = m (in kilograms) multiplied by (299,792,458 m/s)2.

from wikipedia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IrishGirl &#8211; Seeing that first pic. made me think of this :<br />
Mass–energy equivalence was proposed in Albert Einstein&#8217;s 1905 paper, &#8220;Does the inertia of a body depend upon its energy-content?&#8221;, one of his Annus Mirabilis (&#8220;Miraculous Year&#8221;) Papers.[1] Einstein was not the first to propose a mass–energy relationship, and various similar formulas appeared before Einstein&#8217;s theory with incorrect numerical coefficients and an incomplete interpretation. Einstein was the first to propose the simple formula and the first to interpret it correctly: as a general principle which follows from the relativistic symmetries of space and time.</p>
<p>In the formula, c2 is the conversion factor required to convert from units of mass to units of energy. The formula does not depend on a specific system of units. Using the International System of Units, joules are used to measure energy, kilograms for mass, meters per second for speed. Note that 1 joule equals 1 kg·m2/s2. In unit-specific terms, E (in joules) = m (in kilograms) multiplied by (299,792,458 m/s)2.</p>
<p>from wikipedia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lilybart</title>
		<link>http://www.themudflats.net/2009/05/27/daily-wrap-up-showing-some-skin/#comment-62606</link>
		<dc:creator>Lilybart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 20:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themudflats.net/?p=4102#comment-62606</guid>
		<description>154 Zggy - if your skirt rides up that high when you sit down, it’s too short.


Or too tight and that is why it rides up so high when you sit down.

But really, she has been on stage all her life in a way.
She should know better and I am still shocked that she learned nothing from the excellent hair  and makeup people and the stylists who dressed her. Nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>154 Zggy &#8211; if your skirt rides up that high when you sit down, it’s too short.</p>
<p>Or too tight and that is why it rides up so high when you sit down.</p>
<p>But really, she has been on stage all her life in a way.<br />
She should know better and I am still shocked that she learned nothing from the excellent hair  and makeup people and the stylists who dressed her. Nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Say NO to Palin in Politics</title>
		<link>http://www.themudflats.net/2009/05/27/daily-wrap-up-showing-some-skin/#comment-62602</link>
		<dc:creator>Say NO to Palin in Politics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 19:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themudflats.net/?p=4102#comment-62602</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d say for a professional it&#039;s a bit too much leg, but she&#039;s proud of em isn&#039;t she.

on the gov&#039;s web site, until they read this, lol

http://gov.state.ak.us/large_photo.php?id=332</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d say for a professional it&#8217;s a bit too much leg, but she&#8217;s proud of em isn&#8217;t she.</p>
<p>on the gov&#8217;s web site, until they read this, lol</p>
<p><a href="http://gov.state.ak.us/large_photo.php?id=332">http://gov.state.ak.us/large_photo.php?id=332</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

