<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open Thread &#8211; Craziness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.themudflats.net/2009/07/08/open-thread-craziness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.themudflats.net/2009/07/08/open-thread-craziness/</link>
	<description>Tiptoeing Through the Muck of Alaskan Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:33:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: curiouser</title>
		<link>http://www.themudflats.net/2009/07/08/open-thread-craziness/#comment-95876</link>
		<dc:creator>curiouser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 21:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themudflats.net/?p=5270#comment-95876</guid>
		<description>410  JHop Says:
Jackie: she won’t get to keep the money personally, but i almost wish that she would - then she would have to pay personal income taxes on it.
-----------------
JHop,  I believe the trust does provide for her, her family and some (covered) staff to use the money however they choose. (See trust 3.a.) I think I remember you commenting that it wasn’t really a legal trust, so, I might have misunderstood you.   The trust also will cover any tax liability related to personal distributions (trust, page 2).  

I could care less if the trust supports the Palins for the rest of their lives if that is what those donating want to do.  The problem, I believe, is that the trust has been misrepresented to be a legal trust when it appear it is not.  

This could be one of her biggest lies and no one is covering it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>410  JHop Says:<br />
Jackie: she won’t get to keep the money personally, but i almost wish that she would &#8211; then she would have to pay personal income taxes on it.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
JHop,  I believe the trust does provide for her, her family and some (covered) staff to use the money however they choose. (See trust 3.a.) I think I remember you commenting that it wasn’t really a legal trust, so, I might have misunderstood you.   The trust also will cover any tax liability related to personal distributions (trust, page 2).  </p>
<p>I could care less if the trust supports the Palins for the rest of their lives if that is what those donating want to do.  The problem, I believe, is that the trust has been misrepresented to be a legal trust when it appear it is not.  </p>
<p>This could be one of her biggest lies and no one is covering it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CG</title>
		<link>http://www.themudflats.net/2009/07/08/open-thread-craziness/#comment-95732</link>
		<dc:creator>CG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themudflats.net/?p=5270#comment-95732</guid>
		<description>Those aren&#039;t moose! They look like some wierd caribou/elk/deer mutation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those aren&#8217;t moose! They look like some wierd caribou/elk/deer mutation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 264 Crayons</title>
		<link>http://www.themudflats.net/2009/07/08/open-thread-craziness/#comment-95455</link>
		<dc:creator>264 Crayons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themudflats.net/?p=5270#comment-95455</guid>
		<description>for you moose scrappers out there:

http://www.etsy.com/view_listing.php?listing_id=27581294</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>for you moose scrappers out there:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.etsy.com/view_listing.php?listing_id=27581294">http://www.etsy.com/view_listing.php?listing_id=27581294</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aussie Blue Sky</title>
		<link>http://www.themudflats.net/2009/07/08/open-thread-craziness/#comment-95404</link>
		<dc:creator>Aussie Blue Sky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themudflats.net/?p=5270#comment-95404</guid>
		<description>JHop, most of the professionals here share their knowledge whenever it&#039;s appropriate - and that&#039;s a good thing, because we count on them. I don&#039;t believe too much Legal Studies 101 is possible - given the quality of lawyering that is for sale in Alaska.

I don&#039;t hang at the forum, but generally when there is something big like a swap happening, AKM will mention it in an oyster roundup or somesuch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JHop, most of the professionals here share their knowledge whenever it&#8217;s appropriate &#8211; and that&#8217;s a good thing, because we count on them. I don&#8217;t believe too much Legal Studies 101 is possible &#8211; given the quality of lawyering that is for sale in Alaska.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t hang at the forum, but generally when there is something big like a swap happening, AKM will mention it in an oyster roundup or somesuch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JHop</title>
		<link>http://www.themudflats.net/2009/07/08/open-thread-craziness/#comment-95388</link>
		<dc:creator>JHop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 09:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themudflats.net/?p=5270#comment-95388</guid>
		<description>interesting. please tell me whenever the next one is or how i can get involved in the future.  

and please tell me if i ever overkill legal studies 101. the last thing i want to be seen as is condescending or lecturing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interesting. please tell me whenever the next one is or how i can get involved in the future.  </p>
<p>and please tell me if i ever overkill legal studies 101. the last thing i want to be seen as is condescending or lecturing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aussie Blue Sky</title>
		<link>http://www.themudflats.net/2009/07/08/open-thread-craziness/#comment-95384</link>
		<dc:creator>Aussie Blue Sky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 09:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themudflats.net/?p=5270#comment-95384</guid>
		<description>JHop, my bad - the purple passion swap is an exchange of something purple with another Mudflatter. Swaps are arranged through the forum. It&#039;s a bit like a Secret Santa thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JHop, my bad &#8211; the purple passion swap is an exchange of something purple with another Mudflatter. Swaps are arranged through the forum. It&#8217;s a bit like a Secret Santa thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aussie Blue Sky</title>
		<link>http://www.themudflats.net/2009/07/08/open-thread-craziness/#comment-95382</link>
		<dc:creator>Aussie Blue Sky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 09:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themudflats.net/?p=5270#comment-95382</guid>
		<description>JHop, I&#039;m really enjoying Legal Studies 101. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JHop, I&#8217;m really enjoying Legal Studies 101. <img src='http://www.themudflats.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JHop</title>
		<link>http://www.themudflats.net/2009/07/08/open-thread-craziness/#comment-95380</link>
		<dc:creator>JHop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 09:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themudflats.net/?p=5270#comment-95380</guid>
		<description>siren - i responded to your Burma thread. and what is this purple passion thing you speak of? it sounds like a delicious and fruity cocktail.

honestyingov- class action suits have different rules and different issues that go along with them. the real key to being successful is to have one really amazing lead plaintiff. the thing is, you need to have standing. meaning, you have to show how you are hurt or damaged by whatever you are suing about.  i am not sure how that would work here. i think the state has to bring suit to dissolve the trust. so if anything, we need to start a campaign to get people to make a big deal about this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>siren &#8211; i responded to your Burma thread. and what is this purple passion thing you speak of? it sounds like a delicious and fruity cocktail.</p>
<p>honestyingov- class action suits have different rules and different issues that go along with them. the real key to being successful is to have one really amazing lead plaintiff. the thing is, you need to have standing. meaning, you have to show how you are hurt or damaged by whatever you are suing about.  i am not sure how that would work here. i think the state has to bring suit to dissolve the trust. so if anything, we need to start a campaign to get people to make a big deal about this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JHop</title>
		<link>http://www.themudflats.net/2009/07/08/open-thread-craziness/#comment-95377</link>
		<dc:creator>JHop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 09:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themudflats.net/?p=5270#comment-95377</guid>
		<description>CG: See the following and tell me what you think...

Sec. 39.52.310.  Complaints.
	(b) A person may file a complaint with the attorney general regarding the conduct of a &lt;b&gt;current or former public officer&lt;/b&gt;. A complaint must be in writing, be signed under oath, and contain a clear statement of the details of the alleged violation

Sec. 39.52.910.  Applicability.
	(a) Except as specifically provided, this chapter applies to all public officers within executive-branch agencies, including members of boards or commissions. This chapter &lt;b&gt;does not apply to&lt;/b&gt;
	(1) a &lt;b&gt;former public officer&lt;/b&gt; of an executive-branch agency unless a provision specifically states that it so applies</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CG: See the following and tell me what you think&#8230;</p>
<p>Sec. 39.52.310.  Complaints.<br />
	(b) A person may file a complaint with the attorney general regarding the conduct of a <b>current or former public officer</b>. A complaint must be in writing, be signed under oath, and contain a clear statement of the details of the alleged violation</p>
<p>Sec. 39.52.910.  Applicability.<br />
	(a) Except as specifically provided, this chapter applies to all public officers within executive-branch agencies, including members of boards or commissions. This chapter <b>does not apply to</b><br />
	(1) a <b>former public officer</b> of an executive-branch agency unless a provision specifically states that it so applies</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: honestyinGov</title>
		<link>http://www.themudflats.net/2009/07/08/open-thread-craziness/#comment-95353</link>
		<dc:creator>honestyinGov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 08:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themudflats.net/?p=5270#comment-95353</guid>
		<description>JHop....
I was just reading the new thread that was up and the picture is of the Women protesting last year. I remember there is a link on Immoral Minority for &quot; Women against Sarah Palin&quot;.

Somebody should try to call them to see if they would like to be part of filing a suit toward shutting down the AFT. Better to have a LOT of names on a Lawsuit rather than just one and they are already organized or were. And  as Alaskans they could be the ones to speak up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JHop&#8230;.<br />
I was just reading the new thread that was up and the picture is of the Women protesting last year. I remember there is a link on Immoral Minority for &#8221; Women against Sarah Palin&#8221;.</p>
<p>Somebody should try to call them to see if they would like to be part of filing a suit toward shutting down the AFT. Better to have a LOT of names on a Lawsuit rather than just one and they are already organized or were. And  as Alaskans they could be the ones to speak up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

