Alaska Fund Trust – Who Knew?

22 07 2009

Well, the dust-storm kicked up yesterday by the leaking of the investigator’s findings regarding the Alaska Fund Trust is still raging.  Presumably taken off-guard, the Palin administration and the Alaska Fund Trust have been scrambling.

A three-page, single-spaced, 10 pt. type press release just came from Kristan Cole, the Trustee of the Alaska Fund Trust.  This is serious stuff.

The usual Palin melodrama is present in the first sentence of the release, citing “the unusual letter that was leaked yesterday, the contents of which are unprecedented in the history of our country.”   This unusual letter is an investigator’s report regarding an ethics complaint filed by Alaska resident Kim Chatman.  In the complaint, Chatman asks whether the Alaska Fund Trust is, in itself, legal.

Now, here’s where it gets interesting.  Did the governor’s supporters create the fund independent of any actions on the part of the governor?  Was she involved in this, or was it simply a bunch of friends getting together and creating it as a surprise.  Was it sanctioned or not?  That’s actually a pretty important piece to this complicated puzzle.  In the report from investigating attorney Tom Daniel, he stated:

If third parties created the legal defense fund completely on their own, free from any direction, influence, or guidance from the governor, it would not seem that the governor “used her position” in violation of the statute.

In Cole’s press release today she states quite clearly:

I want to be clear on a point that has been misrepresented:  The Governor is not and was not involved with the Trust.  The Governor has never worked on or with the Trust.  The Governor has not even accepted or requested one penny from the Trust or quite frankly anything of me.  And I have never expected anything from her.  Really, it’s quite  the contrary; as I, and many other caring folks across the country have only sought to help with this legal burden.

The first and only time I have spoken with the Governor about the Trust was yesterday to alert her that I was responding to this violation of the law and leak of preliminary and confidential materials from the complaint.

So, according to Kristan Cole, the Governor’s long-time friend, she has never spoken to the Governor about the Alaska Fund Trust until yesterday. It was thought up, researched, created, launched, and was actively soliciting donations for Sarah Palin and she had never discussed it with her.  And since the governor knew nothing about it, nobody can say that she “used her position” in violation of the statute.  Remember that for later.

It becomes necessary here to take a little trip in the Mudflats time machine.  Climb aboard and let’s set the dial back to March of this year.  At that time, there was much talk and speculation about Sarah Palin’s then up-and-coming legal defense fund.  It was quite a story for a few days, with some interesting twists and turns.  The governor had been complaining profusely about the legal bills that were piling up from her personal attorney.  Here’s what she had to say then:

Obviously we cannot afford to personally pay these bills — and really no future governor should feel the sense of financial vulnerability at the hands of those with a political vendetta bent on personal destruction,” Palin wrote. “Some have suggested a legal fund to pay these bills. We’ll have to pursue that.”

We. We will have to pursue a legal fund.  Hm.

Now, think back if you will to April 7, when a certain Texas businessman and owner of a U-Haul dealership named Clayton Paslay decided to set up a legal defense fund for the governor.  He was all excited to help out.  He thought Sarah Palin was swell.  He got the idea from Bill O’Reilly, who said he’d be the first one to donate to it.  So, according to Clayton Paslay, he called Thomas Van Flein and talked to him about it first.  After getting the thumbs up, he went for it.

According to the organizer,the defense money raised will go directly to Thomas Van Flein, Governor Palin’s private attorney.

Clayton Paslay, a businessman who splits his time between Texas and Southern California, set up the fund. [snip]

Clayton tells me that he has never met the Governor, but set up the fund because he wants her “to get a fair shake.” [snip]

Mr. Paslay says he filed all the federal election legal papers for the special fund and spoke with Governor Palin’s attorney. I called Mr. Van Flein’s office and they confirmed that the fund is legitimate.

It took less than 24 hours for the Palin camp to come out with a statement completely disavowing this rogue fund, stating that nobody should be donating to it. This from the Anchorage Daily News Politics Blog:

There’s  buzz today about  a new legal fund created for Gov. Sarah Palin. But the family spokeswoman says it’s not sanctioned by Palin.  “It’s not official. Neither the governor nor her attorney can accept monies from a group like this. There is one that is in the process of being established,” said Palin spokeswoman Meg Stapleton.

So, basically, nobody had any idea who the heck this Texas U-Haul dealer guy was, and they certainly didn’t want him collecting money for the governor, even though he stated that he spoke to Palin’s lawyer Thomas Van Flein, the presumed recipient of all this money, and it was all just fine with him.

Their concern about people donating?  It wasn’t sanctioned by Palin.  It wasn’t “official.”  Hm.

The governor’s spokeswoman Meg Stapleton then released the following statement on the SarahPAC website:

“At this time, we ask you to please hold your much appreciated donation and keep checking back here for the link to the Alaska Fund Trust, the official legal defense fund that will be announced shortly to help the family and state colleagues pay off legal debts incurred by politically-motivated attacks.”

And who exactly is behind SarahPAC?  On their site we find this:

Gov. Palin is the honorary chair of SarahPac, and its supporters are Republicans, Democrats, Independents, and those unaffiliated with any political party.

We. We ask you to wait and donate to the official defense fund.

And lo and behold, the official defense fund arrived – The Alaska Fund Trust.  And who was the trustee?  Kristan Cole -  Palin’s Wasilla High School buddy, long-time friend, appointed by Palin as Chair of the Board of Agriculture, appointed to the board of the Royalty Oil and Gas Commission, a member of the Creamery Board, a private company owned by the state of Alaska.  Remember her?  She’s the one who never talked to the governor about anything to do with the Alaska Fund Trust until yesterday.  Hm.

Cole states that she “did not seek out this position,” but was “willing to step up to the plate and served when asked.”

Asked by whom?  And with whose knowledge?


Actions

Informations

460 Responses to “Alaska Fund Trust – Who Knew?”

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10]

  1. 451
    JHop Says:

    ds55 Says:
    July 23rd, 2009 at 11:54 AM: SP probably paid out money from the AFT already. I’d bet she has at least promised payouts.

    good point, i agree.

  2. 452
    Bystander Says:

    Sarah was shocked, shocked I tell you, to discover the Fund existed a couple of days ago. My God, Sarah and Kristan how dumb do you think we are?

  3. 453
    beth Says:

    JHop @ 438 Says: “… but i don’t think she could sue for defamation. they haven’t defamed her or even damaged her.”
    ——-
    JHop: Wouldn’t the ‘damage’ be that they (AFT) had ’caused’ *another* pesky frivolous ethics charge? And didn’t scrutiny brought about *by* that frivolous ethics charge cause [some] people to have a negative view of her Sarahness and of her Sarahness’ family and associations?

    At the very least, couldn’t/wouldn’t AFT be held culpable as a material party to instigating/giving birth to [for want of better terms] the frivolous ethics charge? Seems to me, (according to the huff-puff indignation and spin coming out, now) her good, ethics-loving, ethics-always-following name *has* been -in the mind (-singular-) of both her and her ‘fans’- been defamed. No?

    Now, whether SP et.al are logical (and/or reality-based) enough to figure out that the ethics charge is as a *direct result* of the AFT and *her* role in/with it, or not, is another matter, entirely… beth.

  4. 454
    Bystander Says:

    Sarah’s defense “the Fund was completely legitimate, but I had no knowledge of it” reminds me of the old story by lawyer “Racehorse” Haynes on the three defenses in a dog bite case:

    1. My dog doesn’t bite.
    2. My dog was asleep in my bedroom and couldn’t have bitten the Plaintiff.
    3. I don’t own a dog.

  5. 455
    Marnie Says:

    Is the fact that, were she not governor, these ethics complaints would not have happened make her association implicit?
    She created the necessity of the complaints becasue she is governor. The complaints necessitated the legal expendatures. The legal expendatures necessitated the fund.
    That’s a straight line logical association that is reasonably predictable, especially once the first complaint occurred, with its expenses.

  6. 456
    ValleyIndependent Says:

    My apologies if someone has already posted this link:

    http://frontiersman.com/articles/2009/07/22/breaking_news/doc4a67b600a8653585675678.txt

    Looks like the realists could use a little help – the bots are out in full force and their tin-foil hats are on tight. There’s even the usual comment about who is paying the anti-Palin bloggers. I sure wish they’d figure it out and post contact info so I could apply for my check.

  7. 457
    PepperzMom (GA) Says:

    You know, something is really off with this whole Daniel finds a problem this time and it’s in the open, supposedly because of a leak from the Board itself.

    I have to wonder…how many other Daniel reports did find a probable cause, but the Board refused to proceed further by ‘dismissing’ the charges?

    So, my questions to everyone are:

    1. Have any of the other investigator’s reports been released?
    2. Is there a mechanism in place for investigator’s reports to be requested by some type of citizen’s request?

    I seem to remember that somewhere around here, if not other AK based blogs that there have been discussions over whether the ‘public’ could request information on closed cases. So if the answer to #2 is a “yea”, I’m up for contributing towards the inevitable high cost of securing those reports. Just spread the word on where to send the $$.

  8. 458
    PepperzMom (GA) Says:

    317 AKPetMom Says: July 22nd, 2009 at 10:32 PM

    OK, looks like my friend DID make the Fund Trust website…that’s what he does and he’s as liberal as anyone I know. He builds websites and makes commercials for a living.

    Doesn’t mean that he is complicit in any of this tinfoil hattery that is going on here.

    God, I’m really disappointed that he’d take business from the barracuda, but hey, everyone has to make a living.

    Sorry Big Slick #255
    ——–
    318 Jackie Says: July 22nd, 2009 at 10:35 PM

    Ak Pet Mom – at least a good guy made some money off of her!

    Hmmm – are either of you sure he was actually PAID, given the grifter aptitude surrounding SP & crew???

  9. 459
    Shannyn Moore: Palin Caught In A Naughty Monkey Trap | www.webhostservices.biz Says:

    [...] “IF THERE WERE A JAR, IT WOULD BE OPEN AND TRANSPARENT!” [...]

  10. 460
    Patrick12344 Says:

    I have collected the screenshots of Sarah’s handwriting and other documents regarding Sarah’s “thank you notes” and organised it in a slide-show on my flickr, easy to watch:

    http://tinyurl.com/kocl7h

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10]