<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Saxby Chambliss &#8211; Death Panel Denier?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.themudflats.net/2009/08/27/saxby-chambliss-death-panel-denier/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.themudflats.net/2009/08/27/saxby-chambliss-death-panel-denier/</link>
	<description>Tiptoeing Through the Muck of Alaskan Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:02:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gasman</title>
		<link>http://www.themudflats.net/2009/08/27/saxby-chambliss-death-panel-denier/#comment-126211</link>
		<dc:creator>Gasman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 20:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themudflats.net/?p=6326#comment-126211</guid>
		<description>Agreed, Chambliss is a lying weasel and should not be trusted.  However, at some point on some issue, the Republicans will not be able to keep all of their soldiers in line.  There will be a/an issue(s) which will force elected Republicans to look to their own electoral realities even if it means breaking rank.  Self interest will dictate that Republicans will support popular issues if they feel not doing so will jeopardize their positions.

Could healthcare reform be the issue?  If President Obama and the Dems play this right it sure could.  How many other issues in front of them enjoy 75+% popularity?  If Specter can switch parties, it is probable that some Republicans will not toe the party line if the issue is big enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed, Chambliss is a lying weasel and should not be trusted.  However, at some point on some issue, the Republicans will not be able to keep all of their soldiers in line.  There will be a/an issue(s) which will force elected Republicans to look to their own electoral realities even if it means breaking rank.  Self interest will dictate that Republicans will support popular issues if they feel not doing so will jeopardize their positions.</p>
<p>Could healthcare reform be the issue?  If President Obama and the Dems play this right it sure could.  How many other issues in front of them enjoy 75+% popularity?  If Specter can switch parties, it is probable that some Republicans will not toe the party line if the issue is big enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: libby</title>
		<link>http://www.themudflats.net/2009/08/27/saxby-chambliss-death-panel-denier/#comment-126058</link>
		<dc:creator>libby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 13:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themudflats.net/?p=6326#comment-126058</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t mean to take the wind out of anyone&#039;s sails with my previous comment about Saxby.  False hope is never a good thing, IMO.  

You can bet that his recent statement benefits him in some way...and ONLY him.

I have to agree with E in New England...&quot;You can’t agree or disagree with something that doesn’t exist!&quot;

The hope I&#039;m hanging onto is in watching folks like Beck et al being backed into their dark little corners.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t mean to take the wind out of anyone&#8217;s sails with my previous comment about Saxby.  False hope is never a good thing, IMO.  </p>
<p>You can bet that his recent statement benefits him in some way&#8230;and ONLY him.</p>
<p>I have to agree with E in New England&#8230;&#8221;You can’t agree or disagree with something that doesn’t exist!&#8221;</p>
<p>The hope I&#8217;m hanging onto is in watching folks like Beck et al being backed into their dark little corners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: InJuneau</title>
		<link>http://www.themudflats.net/2009/08/27/saxby-chambliss-death-panel-denier/#comment-126002</link>
		<dc:creator>InJuneau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 06:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themudflats.net/?p=6326#comment-126002</guid>
		<description>Ooooo, we saw the Kennedy clip on Rachel; very cool!  (PM me on the Forum if you want to know &lt;i&gt;why&lt;/i&gt; I think it&#039;s so cool!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ooooo, we saw the Kennedy clip on Rachel; very cool!  (PM me on the Forum if you want to know <i>why</i> I think it&#8217;s so cool!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lacy Lady</title>
		<link>http://www.themudflats.net/2009/08/27/saxby-chambliss-death-panel-denier/#comment-125993</link>
		<dc:creator>Lacy Lady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 05:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themudflats.net/?p=6326#comment-125993</guid>
		<description>Now that we have Beck on the run, we need to work on getting rid of Hannity.
As far as beck still on the booze--I think he is also in Rush Limbaugh&#039;s medicine cabinet.  I swear that man needs to be put in a &quot;home&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that we have Beck on the run, we need to work on getting rid of Hannity.<br />
As far as beck still on the booze&#8211;I think he is also in Rush Limbaugh&#8217;s medicine cabinet.  I swear that man needs to be put in a &#8220;home&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: InJuneau</title>
		<link>http://www.themudflats.net/2009/08/27/saxby-chambliss-death-panel-denier/#comment-125990</link>
		<dc:creator>InJuneau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 05:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themudflats.net/?p=6326#comment-125990</guid>
		<description>KaJo--ooo, Rachel had that video?  It can be found, directly from the source, here:  http://vilda.alaska.edu/cdm4/item_viewer.php?CISOROOT=/cdmg21&amp;CISOPTR=10053&amp;REC=2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KaJo&#8211;ooo, Rachel had that video?  It can be found, directly from the source, here:  <a href="http://vilda.alaska.edu/cdm4/item_viewer.php?CISOROOT=/cdmg21&#038;CISOPTR=10053&#038;REC=2">http://vilda.alaska.edu/cdm4/item_viewer.php?CISOROOT=/cdmg21&#038;CISOPTR=10053&#038;REC=2</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E in New England</title>
		<link>http://www.themudflats.net/2009/08/27/saxby-chambliss-death-panel-denier/#comment-125956</link>
		<dc:creator>E in New England</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 04:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themudflats.net/?p=6326#comment-125956</guid>
		<description>I would like to be more optimistic, but I just can&#039;t.

First off, &quot;we just didn&#039;t get around&quot; to fixing healthcare? Umm, yeah, methinks not. That makes it sound like we&#039;ve just been busy with other stuff, like when you&#039;ve been meaning to call your mom back, and you just haven&#039;t found a spare minute.

Second, he disagrees with Palin on death panels. There&#039;s nothing to disagree with! It&#039;s not like Palin said &quot;hey, that sounds like a death panel!&quot; and someone else said &quot;no, no, it&#039;s a [whatever].&quot; THERE ARE NO DEATH PANELS. They do not exist! You can&#039;t agree or disagree with something that doesn&#039;t exist! *smacks head on table*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to be more optimistic, but I just can&#8217;t.</p>
<p>First off, &#8220;we just didn&#8217;t get around&#8221; to fixing healthcare? Umm, yeah, methinks not. That makes it sound like we&#8217;ve just been busy with other stuff, like when you&#8217;ve been meaning to call your mom back, and you just haven&#8217;t found a spare minute.</p>
<p>Second, he disagrees with Palin on death panels. There&#8217;s nothing to disagree with! It&#8217;s not like Palin said &#8220;hey, that sounds like a death panel!&#8221; and someone else said &#8220;no, no, it&#8217;s a [whatever].&#8221; THERE ARE NO DEATH PANELS. They do not exist! You can&#8217;t agree or disagree with something that doesn&#8217;t exist! *smacks head on table*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sauerkraut</title>
		<link>http://www.themudflats.net/2009/08/27/saxby-chambliss-death-panel-denier/#comment-125933</link>
		<dc:creator>sauerkraut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 03:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themudflats.net/?p=6326#comment-125933</guid>
		<description>I have no respect for Chambliss.   He tried to hitch his wagon to her glutes  and for that he needs to do some serious penance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no respect for Chambliss.   He tried to hitch his wagon to her glutes  and for that he needs to do some serious penance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aussiegal77</title>
		<link>http://www.themudflats.net/2009/08/27/saxby-chambliss-death-panel-denier/#comment-125895</link>
		<dc:creator>aussiegal77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 02:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themudflats.net/?p=6326#comment-125895</guid>
		<description>Sorry....correction.....I will hold my applause UNTIL he can make it thru the weekend without a retraction =D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry&#8230;.correction&#8230;..I will hold my applause UNTIL he can make it thru the weekend without a retraction =D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aussiegal77</title>
		<link>http://www.themudflats.net/2009/08/27/saxby-chambliss-death-panel-denier/#comment-125893</link>
		<dc:creator>aussiegal77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 02:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themudflats.net/?p=6326#comment-125893</guid>
		<description>well....color me suprised.....A Repub being.....honest?  And decent?  Are the 4 Horsemen on their way as we speak?

I like what I see but I will hold my applause if Chambliss makes it thru tomorrow and the weekend without a retraction or back pedal of his comments or an apology to Rush for defying party lines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well&#8230;.color me suprised&#8230;..A Repub being&#8230;..honest?  And decent?  Are the 4 Horsemen on their way as we speak?</p>
<p>I like what I see but I will hold my applause if Chambliss makes it thru tomorrow and the weekend without a retraction or back pedal of his comments or an apology to Rush for defying party lines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: strangelet</title>
		<link>http://www.themudflats.net/2009/08/27/saxby-chambliss-death-panel-denier/#comment-125890</link>
		<dc:creator>strangelet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 02:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themudflats.net/?p=6326#comment-125890</guid>
		<description>Aussie, you have a nasty mind.  I like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aussie, you have a nasty mind.  I like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

