<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Little Odds &amp; Ends</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.themudflats.net/2009/10/04/little-odds-ends/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.themudflats.net/2009/10/04/little-odds-ends/</link>
	<description>Tiptoeing Through the Muck of Alaskan Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:22:18 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MNBlue</title>
		<link>http://www.themudflats.net/2009/10/04/little-odds-ends/#comment-137768</link>
		<dc:creator>MNBlue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 19:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themudflats.net/?p=7097#comment-137768</guid>
		<description>Michele Bachmann is a disgrace to the USA, MN, and the 6th. If you&#039;re interested in getting rid of Bachmann, support democratic candidate Dr. Maureen Reed! You can learn more about Maureen, and donate, at:
http://maureenreedforcongress.com/
and
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maureen_Reed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michele Bachmann is a disgrace to the USA, MN, and the 6th. If you&#8217;re interested in getting rid of Bachmann, support democratic candidate Dr. Maureen Reed! You can learn more about Maureen, and donate, at:<br />
<a href="http://maureenreedforcongress.com/">http://maureenreedforcongress.com/</a><br />
and<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maureen_Reed">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maureen_Reed</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alaska Pi</title>
		<link>http://www.themudflats.net/2009/10/04/little-odds-ends/#comment-137682</link>
		<dc:creator>Alaska Pi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 13:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themudflats.net/?p=7097#comment-137682</guid>
		<description>factors affectin = factors affectinG
whew... 
being around all this talk about the blathering bimbo sometimes affects my ability to spot  phony accents creeping into conversation...
apologies...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>factors affectin = factors affectinG<br />
whew&#8230;<br />
being around all this talk about the blathering bimbo sometimes affects my ability to spot  phony accents creeping into conversation&#8230;<br />
apologies&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alaska Pi</title>
		<link>http://www.themudflats.net/2009/10/04/little-odds-ends/#comment-137680</link>
		<dc:creator>Alaska Pi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 13:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themudflats.net/?p=7097#comment-137680</guid>
		<description>AKM- 
The NYT article , while full of information on one level, was very disappointing on many others.
It failed to mention the Pacific Salmon Treaty requirement for escapement to Canadian waters for the Yukon Chinook... and the malfunctioning sonar which allowed fish managers to underestimate the Chinook run to the extent that they closed the Chinook commercial fishery on the lower Yukon and allowed far more fish by than expected. 
It failed to report EXACTLY what the federal fisheries managers meant about a regular shift in waters off the coast IN RELATION to OTHER factors affectin the fishery- man-made and natural.
It failed to report the record breaking flooding and damage all along the Alaskan Yukon this spring... and how and why that may have affected folks&#039; fishing ability this summer.
I was glad to see the people part of the story as people along the river get forgotten, even here in Alaska, but sure am bummed that technical and scientific info was shortchanged to the extent that the article is more like one of those Sunday &quot;Neighbors&#039; sections... darn...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AKM-<br />
The NYT article , while full of information on one level, was very disappointing on many others.<br />
It failed to mention the Pacific Salmon Treaty requirement for escapement to Canadian waters for the Yukon Chinook&#8230; and the malfunctioning sonar which allowed fish managers to underestimate the Chinook run to the extent that they closed the Chinook commercial fishery on the lower Yukon and allowed far more fish by than expected.<br />
It failed to report EXACTLY what the federal fisheries managers meant about a regular shift in waters off the coast IN RELATION to OTHER factors affectin the fishery- man-made and natural.<br />
It failed to report the record breaking flooding and damage all along the Alaskan Yukon this spring&#8230; and how and why that may have affected folks&#8217; fishing ability this summer.<br />
I was glad to see the people part of the story as people along the river get forgotten, even here in Alaska, but sure am bummed that technical and scientific info was shortchanged to the extent that the article is more like one of those Sunday &#8220;Neighbors&#8217; sections&#8230; darn&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mudbug</title>
		<link>http://www.themudflats.net/2009/10/04/little-odds-ends/#comment-137672</link>
		<dc:creator>Mudbug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 13:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themudflats.net/?p=7097#comment-137672</guid>
		<description>Look, I&#039;m not rich at all.  I have seven kids.  I have NO insurance right now, as it&#039;s too expensive for the bugdet. We save money every month for medical check ups, dental bills etc.  I DON&#039;T want governemtn health care.  But I do want some sort of low cost insurance I can buy for my family, in case something &#039;big&#039; happens.  I can handle an 60 buck co -pay and even the 20 bucks or so for meds.  But if one of us got seriously ill, we&#039;d lose it all.   

We also live a healthy lifestyle. We don&#039;t drink, smoke, or take drugs that have a zillion side effects!  We excercise daily, and teach our kids to do the same. We&#039;re an active family.  there HAS to be a happy medium.  I was embarrassed with Joe Wilson&#039;s outburst, and do not agree with it at all.  On the other side, Grayson was way overboard.  Lets&#039; create a standard and stick to it.?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look, I&#8217;m not rich at all.  I have seven kids.  I have NO insurance right now, as it&#8217;s too expensive for the bugdet. We save money every month for medical check ups, dental bills etc.  I DON&#8217;T want governemtn health care.  But I do want some sort of low cost insurance I can buy for my family, in case something &#8216;big&#8217; happens.  I can handle an 60 buck co -pay and even the 20 bucks or so for meds.  But if one of us got seriously ill, we&#8217;d lose it all.   </p>
<p>We also live a healthy lifestyle. We don&#8217;t drink, smoke, or take drugs that have a zillion side effects!  We excercise daily, and teach our kids to do the same. We&#8217;re an active family.  there HAS to be a happy medium.  I was embarrassed with Joe Wilson&#8217;s outburst, and do not agree with it at all.  On the other side, Grayson was way overboard.  Lets&#8217; create a standard and stick to it.?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mudbug</title>
		<link>http://www.themudflats.net/2009/10/04/little-odds-ends/#comment-137669</link>
		<dc:creator>Mudbug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 13:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themudflats.net/?p=7097#comment-137669</guid>
		<description>Schafly is a relious bigot.  She refused to attend a National day of Prayer breakfast if the LDS contingent was there and offering the prayer. Our God must be differnt from hers.   

Prejean will strip for God.  she&#039;s a religious nutcase who claims she was just trying to get her career started with nudie photo&#039;s. Yup. that&#039;s a GREAT role model for my daughters.  Standards are for others. It&#039;s OK to preach abstence, while doing your boyfriend who may or may not have put a ring on your finger, so long as you both attend the &#039;right&#039; church.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Schafly is a relious bigot.  She refused to attend a National day of Prayer breakfast if the LDS contingent was there and offering the prayer. Our God must be differnt from hers.   </p>
<p>Prejean will strip for God.  she&#8217;s a religious nutcase who claims she was just trying to get her career started with nudie photo&#8217;s. Yup. that&#8217;s a GREAT role model for my daughters.  Standards are for others. It&#8217;s OK to preach abstence, while doing your boyfriend who may or may not have put a ring on your finger, so long as you both attend the &#8216;right&#8217; church.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trisha</title>
		<link>http://www.themudflats.net/2009/10/04/little-odds-ends/#comment-137665</link>
		<dc:creator>trisha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themudflats.net/?p=7097#comment-137665</guid>
		<description>@24 nswfm CA,   I like your idea.   I think we start with a blingee contest for each of women in the calendar.

On another note, I read (I think at Huffpo) that the &quot;conservative&quot; woman (can&#039;t remember her name) who put together the calendar said, We pray that Palin will join us next year.  

OMG, gag.   So, did Palin NOT get the cover that she wanted, so didn&#039;t do it?  Maybe Palin thought she should be paid big money for the use of her iconic image.  Once again, blowing off conservative women.   What a diva.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@24 nswfm CA,   I like your idea.   I think we start with a blingee contest for each of women in the calendar.</p>
<p>On another note, I read (I think at Huffpo) that the &#8220;conservative&#8221; woman (can&#8217;t remember her name) who put together the calendar said, We pray that Palin will join us next year.  </p>
<p>OMG, gag.   So, did Palin NOT get the cover that she wanted, so didn&#8217;t do it?  Maybe Palin thought she should be paid big money for the use of her iconic image.  Once again, blowing off conservative women.   What a diva.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trisha</title>
		<link>http://www.themudflats.net/2009/10/04/little-odds-ends/#comment-137664</link>
		<dc:creator>trisha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themudflats.net/?p=7097#comment-137664</guid>
		<description>I thought Palin should have been Miss July.    She could have been &quot;Quittin&#039; on the Fourth of July&quot;.   I quit, in honor of the troops.

Anyone remember the Vanity Fair cover that Tina Fey did last year with the little Red-White and Blue outfit?     Only, Tina is much prettier than Sara and I&#039;m really not interested in seeing Scarah in an  outfit that shows that much leg.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought Palin should have been Miss July.    She could have been &#8220;Quittin&#8217; on the Fourth of July&#8221;.   I quit, in honor of the troops.</p>
<p>Anyone remember the Vanity Fair cover that Tina Fey did last year with the little Red-White and Blue outfit?     Only, Tina is much prettier than Sara and I&#8217;m really not interested in seeing Scarah in an  outfit that shows that much leg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trisha</title>
		<link>http://www.themudflats.net/2009/10/04/little-odds-ends/#comment-137663</link>
		<dc:creator>trisha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themudflats.net/?p=7097#comment-137663</guid>
		<description>How exactly does posing for a calandar mean that Carrie-the-topless- Christian is being taken seriously?  

Wow...she&#039;s just a deep thinker</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How exactly does posing for a calandar mean that Carrie-the-topless- Christian is being taken seriously?  </p>
<p>Wow&#8230;she&#8217;s just a deep thinker</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kath the Scrappy</title>
		<link>http://www.themudflats.net/2009/10/04/little-odds-ends/#comment-137653</link>
		<dc:creator>Kath the Scrappy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 10:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themudflats.net/?p=7097#comment-137653</guid>
		<description>@ 53 Kath the Scrappy
&quot;WRT the media ignoring many issues and people wondering why? &quot;

Another point I forgot to mention, is that the Seattle Times (staunch Repub-leaning) is NOT a Rudolph Murdoch owned publication.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ 53 Kath the Scrappy<br />
&#8220;WRT the media ignoring many issues and people wondering why? &#8221;</p>
<p>Another point I forgot to mention, is that the Seattle Times (staunch Repub-leaning) is NOT a Rudolph Murdoch owned publication.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kath the Scrappy</title>
		<link>http://www.themudflats.net/2009/10/04/little-odds-ends/#comment-137652</link>
		<dc:creator>Kath the Scrappy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 10:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themudflats.net/?p=7097#comment-137652</guid>
		<description>Molly, I agree with so many others:
GREAT rant!

WRT the media ignoring many issues and people wondering why?  A couple weeks ago, I&#039;m not sure which blog I was reading (thought it may have been here) someone commented.  Have you noticed just how MANY &amp; how LONG the pharmaceuticals have advertisements on TV @ every station?  Listing every side effect possible, spending so long with all the side effects, you just want to ask WHY they are advertising when the product is bound to kill you?  

That poster said it was part of dumping pharma money into their programming.  When the station is so reliant on the income from those advertisements, they will surely hesitate to write/print anything critical that might stop the money flows from the pharmas. 

Since then, I&#039;ve been watching.  Now, here in our recently One Newspaper town, the Seattle P.I. (Dem-leaning) went out of business a few months ago.  The Seattle Times (staunch Repub-leaning) has had to tone down their rhetoric, loosen up their editorials, report more of the news for fear of losing us P.I. subscribers they inherited.  Yep, no need to subscribe, they automatically switched our newspapers the following morning, unless we had called to cancel.

Over the past couple months I&#039;ve started noticing blownup fullpage ads, totally colored &amp; huge font size to take up the entire page - sometimes 2-3 of these ads in the &quot;A&quot; front section for this pill or that pill.  Listing all the side effects, etc.  In the front section, you KNOW that has to be expensive advertising!

With all this Healthcare debate going on, I just have to believe it&#039;s part &amp; parcel of the same program as that Poster mentioned.  Make the newspaper so dependent (at a time their sales are slipping) so that they don&#039;t DARE take a strong stance for the Public Option or offer any criticism of the status quo.

Sorry this is so long, but I&#039;ve been mulling it over in my head and needed to put it out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Molly, I agree with so many others:<br />
GREAT rant!</p>
<p>WRT the media ignoring many issues and people wondering why?  A couple weeks ago, I&#8217;m not sure which blog I was reading (thought it may have been here) someone commented.  Have you noticed just how MANY &amp; how LONG the pharmaceuticals have advertisements on TV @ every station?  Listing every side effect possible, spending so long with all the side effects, you just want to ask WHY they are advertising when the product is bound to kill you?  </p>
<p>That poster said it was part of dumping pharma money into their programming.  When the station is so reliant on the income from those advertisements, they will surely hesitate to write/print anything critical that might stop the money flows from the pharmas. </p>
<p>Since then, I&#8217;ve been watching.  Now, here in our recently One Newspaper town, the Seattle P.I. (Dem-leaning) went out of business a few months ago.  The Seattle Times (staunch Repub-leaning) has had to tone down their rhetoric, loosen up their editorials, report more of the news for fear of losing us P.I. subscribers they inherited.  Yep, no need to subscribe, they automatically switched our newspapers the following morning, unless we had called to cancel.</p>
<p>Over the past couple months I&#8217;ve started noticing blownup fullpage ads, totally colored &amp; huge font size to take up the entire page &#8211; sometimes 2-3 of these ads in the &#8220;A&#8221; front section for this pill or that pill.  Listing all the side effects, etc.  In the front section, you KNOW that has to be expensive advertising!</p>
<p>With all this Healthcare debate going on, I just have to believe it&#8217;s part &amp; parcel of the same program as that Poster mentioned.  Make the newspaper so dependent (at a time their sales are slipping) so that they don&#8217;t DARE take a strong stance for the Public Option or offer any criticism of the status quo.</p>
<p>Sorry this is so long, but I&#8217;ve been mulling it over in my head and needed to put it out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
