Forget Bailey, he can only incriminate himself if he speaks the truth, so don’t count on anything from him.

All anyone can do is write what they see in their own blogs, and hope a few people see the light.

He followers are definatly cult material. No question in my mind.

The stupider a person, the more rigid their beliefs. I’m thinking of a very dumb girl (actually a touch brain damaged ) calling her intelligent father stupid, and not much of sense came out of her mouth. You had to grit your teeth to be around her. But her father was protective, and never said a word.

Is Palin a touch brain damaged? That word salad thing. She often doesn’t make sense, as Levi mentioned in the Vanity Fair article.

That’s what I feel about Palinites. That they are a touch brain damaged.

Andree, what’s the worst that could happen if someone is found guilty of violating the AK Executive Branch Ethics Act? So far the punishments (IF applied) don’t seem to be too severe. Absolutely he should worry more, I’d say, about the perjury thing.

My guess, then, is that nothing he says in the book will directly contradict anything he told the investigators, but may be additional information about stuff they never asked, or maybe … the book will criticize one or both of the investigations themselves. Maybe what he’s going to ‘out’ is the influence the RNC had over this whole investigation. Who was that guy that turned up there? Last name started with an M, I think? Apparently coined the term ‘tasergate’? Must go re-google.

Bailey may not skewer Sarah, but I doubt he will paint her in a rosy peaches n cream light. I expect we will see e-mails, and I suspect they will not be favorable to her not because of her content, but because of her (I’m guessing) lack of tact, decorum, intelligence, leadership skills, proper spelling, and inclusion of inappropriate if not downright mean comments. In a word, her complete unprofessionalism and therefore her unsuitability to hold any office, much less the highest office in a state government, will be on display for anyone in the world to see – and I hope they do.

Anyway, all that is pure speculation, but if it was me, there would be a tipping point – If I was holding on to information that I felt could make me a quick buck, I wouldn’t necessarily want to do so if it meant complicating my life legally/monetarily (perhaps his rationale while he was working for SP). But if I thought the information was not just valuable but truly important, could make a difference for people to know, I would be willing to take more of a risk. Y’know, be a little “renegade-y”.

Library of Congress has a few listings, but whether this is she or not, I couldn’t say as they all carry an additional name.

There are numerous entries for a Joy E. Morgan, but she lived back in the late 1800s and early 1900s, so it certainly isn’t the same person.

It is obviously a common name as there are well over a dozen on LinkedIn alone.

Would be interesting to see how legit this person and her company really are!