Mail Bag – Juneau

12 03 2010

This letter to the editor in the Juneau Empire caught my eye.  It’s a further discussion of resources that we all enjoy being put in corporate hands. I touched on this issue and the inherent conflict of interest of a legislator who not only serves the area affected by this bill, but who sits on the board of the corporation who stands to benefit from it.  You can read that article HERE.

Sealaska should be held to the deal made in ‘72
Juneau Empire

The Sealaska Corp. lands bill would change the character of Southeast Alaska more than any other land use decision since the Long-Term Timber Sales of the 1950s. Those huge timber sales impacted vast areas of land, but at least most of the logging avoided sites that were heavily used by the public and the land remained in public ownership, hunting and all the other uses we enjoy.

The Sealaska lands bill is different. If the bill is passes, hundreds of the most important and beloved sites on the Tongass would be transferred from a public trust to the hands of a for-profit corporation. Many of the sites are immensely valuable, containing millions of dollars of public investment in roads, docks, second growth thinning, recreation cabins and trails. They are arrayed in a dense pattern across the region and they would have few permanent restrictions to ensure public access or responsible development.

The small businesses that rely on these sites would be displaced. Even more incredible, under the law, Sealaska would have the right to select 1,200 more acres at a future time, without the public’s approval. This could easily mean hundreds of more places in corporate hands.

I believe that Sealaska should be held to the deal they made in 1972 and select their lands from within the established selection boundaries. I do not trust Sealaska’s claim that they will be good stewards of the land because I have seen firsthand how Sealaska has managed their previous selections – clearcut right up to the property lines in all directions, with no concern for wildlife and only very minimal protection for fisheries.

Take a look at the map of the proposed selections and contact Sens. Lisa Murkowski and Mark Begich if you have concerns. This is a land allocation issue of momentous importance to the future of Southeast Alaska.

Barth Hamberg, Sitka, Alaska

**********************************

Senator Mark Begich 202-224-3004
Senator Lisa Murkowski 202-224-6665



Voices from the Flats – Shannyn Moore on Skinning the Truth

12 03 2010

Shannyn Moore has come up with some more information on Al Barette, Alaska’s newest appointee to the Board of Game.  It is not to late to strongly oppose this appointment, as he has not yet been confirmed by the Legislature. You’ll find a call to action at the end of the post.  Tell your legislators that not only do you want people who make game management decisions based on science and not the Old Testament, but that you want people who do not stand to benefit financially at the expense of others, from the decisions that they make on the board.  Please help send a strong message that we care who sits on these boards, and that the National Park “resources” that they manage matter to all of us.

****Please also heed the authors warning about the embedded video, which is graphic and disturbing.  If you don’t watch it, I urge you to listen to the audio and look away. 

************************************

Skinning the Truth

by Shannyn Moore

Wolves have been in the news lately. In today’s Anchorage Daily News, there was speculation that a wolf might have killed a young school teacher in Chignik. Last week, the Alaska Board of Game voted 4-3 to eliminate the buffer zone around Denali National Park despite the wolf population plummeting to a 23-year low. Late biologist Gordon Haber fought to his early death to protect those wolves. Governor Sean Parnell appointed Al Barrette to replace Bob Bell on the Alaska Board of Game.

Who is Al Barrette? Mudflats wrote a great post that you can find here. Barrette, who has an obvious and unambiguous conflict of interest, cast the deciding vote to open up the northeast periphery of the Denali National Park to wolf trapping. Barrette owns both the Fairbanks Fur Tannery and Alaskan No. 9 Trap Company. The latter manufactures the Alaska Wolf Trap. Apparently, Mr. Barrette didn’t think he had a conflict of interest-despite casting a public vote to bolster his personal bottom line.

There is much we don’t know about Governor Sean Parnell’s ethically-challenged appointee to the Alaska Board of Game. I think Al Barrette best reveals Al Barrette in this short video shot by Backpacker Magazine a little over a year ago. At that time, Barrette was on the Fairbanks Advisory Council to the Alaska Board of Game.

I’m Just a Girl from Homer, and I grew up trapping animals with my father. That said, this video disturbed me. If you feel like you can’t watch it, at least LISTEN to it. Listen to Al Barrette wax poetic about his philosophy on religion, science and wolves…

WARNING! THIS VIDEO IS GRAPHIC AND CONTAINS IMAGES MANY COULD SHOULD FIND OBJECTIONABLE!

 

For those of you who couldn’t watch or listen, I transcribed Mr. Barrette’s comments at the beginning of the film:

Al Barrette on the bible and man’s role in game management:

“…it specifically puts out in the first book of the bible, in Genesis, that we should, uh, subdue nature and control it. We should be the managers of the animals and through the…the sin of Adam and Eve is what brought it on, and, uh, in fact, the first, uh…the first clothes that were made for Adam and Eve were skins of animals…by God.”

VITAMIN DEMOCRACY!

Al Barrette still must be confirmed by the legislature. Find your legislators and tell them to reject Al Barrette for the Alaska Board of Game. Contact your state senator and representative.

Email Governor Sean Parnell or call him at 907.465.3500 tell him to withdraw his conflicted nominee from consideration.

Email the State of Alaska Boards and Commissions at boards@alaska.gov or call them 907.465.3934 and express yourself.



Parnell Administration Targets Wolves and Alaska’s Economy – Time to Howl!

9 03 2010

Last week, the Alaska Board of Game voted 4-3 to open the Northeast periphery of the Denali National Park and preserve to wolf trapping. What this means is that an area around the National Park, referred to as a “buffer zone” no longer exists. The buffer zone was put into place to help preserve the wolves that live in the park and are a huge draw for tourism and wildlife photographers. In recent years, pack leaders wandered out of the park and fell victim to trapping, raising the hackles of wildlife organizations, conservationists, residents who love wildlife, and the tourism industry.

And now, thanks to the challenged decision-making of our new governor (who is much like the old governor on this issue) the tourism boycott has begun.  Thanks a lot, Governor Parnell.  I’m sure business owners across the state are really excited about this, especially since the economy has already reduced tourism by double digits last summer.

The buffer zone helps to keep these Denali wolves alive, because, frankly, wolves don’t really know where the park boundary ends, and where they need to be to stay safe. These packs, which have been studied since the 1930s, have a natural range and it doesn’t exactly conform to the boundary of the park.  And now the northeast periphery, which was formerly a protected area, is open for trapping thanks to this vote by the Board of Game.

The decision swings in the opposite direction  of what park authorities had asked for. The federal authorities had recommended expanding the buffer zone to protect the wolves that wander outside the park’s boundaries. Those particular wolves are the ones typically seen by busloads of tourists who visit the park every summer.

The wolf population is the lowest it has been since 1987, park authorities say. While they don’t know for sure why the numbers have plummeted, they say there has been trapping pressure on the animals.

There are about 70 wolves left in the 6-million-acre park.

Let’s look at this 4-3 vote.

Sometimes the best way to understand a vote, is to understand the votER.  So, let’s hunker down and learn about the latest appointment to this board, one of those on the “4″ side that voted to remove the buffer zone and increase the trapping of wolves.  Governor Sean Parnell recently appointed a man named Al Barette of Fairbanks to the Board.  Mr. Barette has an interesting history.

He retired from the military in 1993 because of an injury, and now lives in Fairbanks with his wife and three children.  He’s also a business owner.  But his kind of business is not the kind of business that will feel the pinch when environmental and wildlife groups expand the boycott on Alaska travel because of this decision.  He owns the kind of business that thinks this decision is just swell.

He owns the Fairbanks Fur Tannery – the first commercial tannery in Alaska.  He started it in 1993 and business is good, but of course it will be better soon.  Here’s a picture of Mr. Barette on the job.

~Al Barette working in his tannery - Backpacker Magazine

Then, in 2002 he purchased another business – The Alaskan No. 9 Trap Company.  And, believe it or not, they manufacture The Alaska Wolf Trap.   Business prospects are looking good for that one too.

One of his favorite things to do is to teach young, inexperienced trappers how to do it better, and is often seen discussing equipment and tactics “over the counter” at the Alaska Fur Tannery.

And he is so dedicated to wolf elimination, he was even the recipient of the very first permit to shoot one from an airplane, after then Lt. Parnell’s poorly worded ballot initiative permitting the practice passed.  Thousands of Alaskans, myself included, voted the wrong way on that initiative because it was worded so poorly.  A cynic might say that the obfuscation was deliberate.  Voters had voted against the aerial hunt twice before but this time it passed.

But surely, there are two sides to every story.  Granted that tourists will suffer, and the wolves of course, and wildlife photographers, and those in the tourism industry, and small business owners who will feel the pinch of tourism boycotts…  But someone has to benefit from this other than just Board of Game member Al Barette who will be able to sell more traps, and tan more hides.  There are others who benefit. See my emphasis below.

Alaska wildlife advocate Rick Steiner called the Denali decision a slap in the face to the park service and to its visitors who come to the park to see, among other animals, a wolf.

“It’s an outrageous decision,” he said. “The Board of Game placed the interests of three or four trappers on the eastern edge of Denali over the interests of hundreds of thousands of visitors to the park, and countless public comments from Alaskans asking not only to maintain the existing buffer but to expand it.”

He said the economic impact of the tourists that the wolves draw to the state make wolves “worth orders of magnitude more alive than dead.”

The interest of three or four trappers AND the interest of the man who cast the deciding vote to eradicate the buffer zone.  Conflict of interest?  Sounds like it to me.

Once again Alaskans are caught up in the epic battle of the hunters.  On the one hand are the wolves who bring tourists to the park and are worth their weight in public relations gold.  They have to eat, and they have the misfortune of liking to eat the same things we do.  On the other hand are those for whom the Alaska wilderness of their dreams is nothing more than a moose and caribou farm with us the only predator.  It’s good for people who like to eat wild game, yes.  But the big money comes from those who  come to Alaska, kill something, and leave.  And so the state may as well stack boards with those who can make a pretty penny off trapping.  It’s a win-win situation for them, and a lose-lose situation for the wolves and those who derive joy and economic benefit from keeping them alive.

It’s time to elect a new governor.  Before you cast your vote in November, find out what your candidate thinks about the current mission of the Board of Game, and find out if they are appalled by the current conflict of interest that exists on the Board, and the administration’s war on tourism and small business.

While waiting to cast your vote, feel free to let the governor know how you feel about this.  And remember, the wolves of Denali National Park belong to ALL of us, wherever in the country we live.  So, even if you’re not in the state, you have a stake in this.

Governor Sean Parnell – http://gov.alaska.gov/parnell/contact/email-the-governor.html

CALL  907-465-3500   FAX: 907-465-3532

PLEASE ALSO CALL YOUR REPRESENTATIVES AND TELL THEM NOT TO CONFIRM BARETTE’S APPOINTMENT. More details on this story to come.



Mark Begich, and the EPA (in which I finally get to use the word ’sphygmomanometer’

25 02 2010

sphymomanometer

I have to admit the other day when I read that Mark Begich opposes the EPA regulating greenhouse gas emissions from stationary sources, I started to feel intense pressure in my capillaries.

After all, this is Lisa Murkowski’s position, and Lisa Murkowski is the former reasonable Republican senator who has now grabbed her teddy bear, crawled in bed with the right wing and turned on the electric blanket.

But Mark Begich?  Had I had a pocket sphygmomanometer on me, I would have used it. (Actually, I’ve just been looking for an excuse to use the word sphygmomanometer in a sentence since junior year in high school when it appeared on the verbal SATs)  Suffice it to say, I was able to sense my pulse in my extremities and my eyeballs at the same time.  Not good.

Because, not only does Lisa Murkowski think that the EPA shouldn’t be regulating greenhouse gas emmisions, but she thinks congress ought to be doing it.  Yes, congress.  If congress were a bunch of scientists, they wouldn’t be in congress.  They’d be….I dunno…. scientists.

But, perhaps now that corporations like Conoco Phillips and BP, and big coal companies can donate limitless amounts of money to promote the elections of congresspeople, and to smear those who oppose them, they can take all the time they would have spent fundraising and take some science courses in their spare time.  Or not.

Sssssssssssssssssssssss….thump. thump. thump. thump. sssssssssssssssssssss.

No, the news from the sphygmomanometer was not good.

Fortunately, the office of the Senator had some answers.  And the answers were not bad.   They talked me down.

First and foremost they told me that The Associated Press story is wrong.  Senator Begich does not oppose the EPA’s powers to regulate greenhouse gases.

Hm.

And furthermore, he did not say that the EPA lacks the power to restrict greenhouse gases and realizes that the U.S. Supreme Court ordered the EPA to make a determination on how to move forward.

Oh.

What they DID do is ask the EPA for clarification on the implementation and timing of new regulations, whereupon the EPA responded that regulations will be phased in and that Congress will be able to write its own energy/climate change bill.

And finally, the Senator recognizes that Alaska is ground zero for climate change and that Congress needs to act.

Ssssssssssssssss……………………………….

OK, I feel better.

Here is the original letter, and the response.

Jacksonletter

ResponseToBegich