My Twitter Feed

March 28, 2024

Headlines:

No Time for Tuckerman -

Thursday, August 3, 2023

The Quitter Returns! -

Monday, March 21, 2022

Putting the goober in gubernatorial -

Friday, January 28, 2022

An Aurora Named Steve

18176180_10212531540380992_507025751_o

I first saw and photographed this phenomenon on August 21, 2014, while shooting the aurora borealis in Portage Valley of the Chugach National Forest with friend and fellow photographer CJ Kale of Lava Light Galleries in Hawaii. The nature of the phenomenon was notably different compared to the typical aurora borealis. It stood straight up from the horizon with a slight bend like a bow, and it pretty much did not move. It had a pale pink hue, and it arced from the west to the east, forming a curved line across the sky.

The times I have seen and photographed this strange arc in the sky have been in August and April. Calvin Hall, a longtime aurora chaser and photographer, shares this observation as well. Over the past nine years, he has seen a few each year, ” usually quite close to the equinox.” He observes that it “has been parallel to but much further South of a diffused wide band of faint aurora … They were pretty consistently aligned with the magnetic North pole.” In each of the cases where I have photographed it, I have also seen it in conjunction with a diffuse band of green aurora – sometimes very bright, others not visible to the naked eye.

When I first saw this phenomenon, I spent a little time searching about on aurora Facebook group pages, and posted pictures of it, asking for feedback on what it was. The common answer was “proton arc,” while some cautioned against such a label because protons could not be visible. One person in particular, Jason Ahrns, a space physicist with the University of Alaska Fairbanks who happens to photograph the aurora and other space phenomena as well as study them, was particularly adamant it could not be a proton arc.

But this week has been all abuzz about this phenomenon, with a group of aurora chasers in Alberta giving it the name of “Steve.” Several articles have been posted, including one in the New York Times, but my favorite article discusses the role of citizen scientists in helping to document a phenomenon that 15 years ago would have cost up to $300 million to document. This is yet another example of the role of digital photography and social media in chasing the nature of aurora chasing.

18195645_10212531540981007_409422284_o

18175993_10212531540220988_373285301_o

18209520_10212531541101010_1186174941_o

18176167_10212531541221013_527147738_o

18209843_10212531540580997_1126953062_o

 

18235947_10212531541141011_177204798_o

18195678_10212531540420993_780486231_o

Comments

comments

Comments
One Response to “An Aurora Named Steve”
  1. Dagian says:

    Wow – that’s simply stunning. Thank you.